We have reciepts on Pam Bondi’s corruption and her links to Trump.
While Bondi was Florida Attorney General (2011–2019), her office received multiple consumer complaints about Trump University.
In September 2013, her office said it was considering joining a multistate lawsuit (led by New York’s Attorney General) on behalf of students who claimed they were defrauded by Trump University.
Four days after Bondi announced she was considering whether Florida would join the New York lawsuit, the Donald J. Trump Foundation made a $25,000 donation to “And Justice for All,” a political group supporting Bondi’s re-election.
This raised allegations of a potential “pay-to-play” or quid pro quo dynamic: critics argued the donation may have influenced her decision not to pursue legal action against Trump University in Florida.
After the donation, Bondi’s office declined to join the New York-led fraud case against Trump University.Her office and Bondi denied that the donation affected their decision, and no definitive proof of wrongdoing has been established.
Here’s a timeline regarding the #EpsteinTrumpCoverUp that Pam Bondi is helping.
Feb 2025:
Bondi requests the “full and complete files” related to Epstein.
The Department of Justice states they received ~200 pages initially, then learned of thousands more.
Feb 27, 2025:
Launch of “Phase 1” release of declassified Epstein documents.
These documents were heavily redacted and did not reportedly contain significant new information.
“On my desk” comment:
In a Fox News interview, Bondi said the client list (if it existed) was “sitting on my desk … to review,” saying it was a directive from President Trump.
That statement drew attention and was later scrutinized.
Demanding documents from the FBI:
After Phase 1, Bondi ordered the FBI to produce all remaining Epstein-related documents by a specific deadline (Feb 28).
Bondi reportedly tasked FBI Director Kash Patel to look into why many documents had not been turned over.
Review and redaction:
In her role, Bondi’s office oversaw which parts of the Epstein files could be declassified and released and which parts would remain redacted or withheld (especially sensitive victim material).
Memo concluding no “client list”:
In July 2025, the DOJ (under Bondi’s leadership) released a memo stating that no credible evidence was found of a “client list,” that Epstein did not blackmail prominent individuals (based on existing evidence), and reaffirming his death was a suicide.
This memo was controversial, especially among critics who believed a list must exist or that powerful figures were shielded.
Briefing Trump:
Reported by the Wall Street Journal and other outlets that Bondi told President Trump in May that his name appeared among the files.
That revelation caused pushback, denials, and internal tension over how the files are being handled.
Congressional scrutiny & oversight hearing:
Bondi has faced Senate Judiciary Committee questioning over her decisions regarding releasing (or withholding) Epstein documents, redactions and claims about what exists.
Some contend that Bondi timed or staged the release for political effect (especially given her role in a Trump administration).
The fact that some documents were not previously disclosed raises questions about what was withheld and why.
Congressional critics argue she may be withholding pertinent documents to protect certain individuals, like Donald Trump.